subscribe
The HogueProphecy Bulletin
Ray Mabus as Antichrist? Part 1
A young Ray Mabus, circa 1972, served in the US Navy as a surface warfare officer on the cruiser USS Little Rock.
Friends,
Enigma is playing in the background late this Friday night, which seems appropriate. I take a little break from writing Predictions for 2010 to issue an article in response to many of your letters about the man in Obama’s cabinet that the mainstream press dare not mention. He who must not be named. You’d think he was some Harry Pottered Voldemort. Poor fellow. He doesn’t deserve these murmurings of being named Mabus after Nostradamus’ final Antichrist of three foreseen. It is a coincidence being rear-ended by a remote possibility
Back on April Fool’s Day 2008, I wrote my first blog about Ray Mabus, the former Mississippi Governor, and former US Ambassador to Saudi Arabia and future Secretary of the Navy. It soon turned out to be no joke of April Fools that Mr. Mabus was officially holding that post fulfilling my prediction the previous summer logged in my book of Nostradamus predictions about Mabus, his Antichrist: Obama would pick a man named after Nostradamus’ Third and Final Antichrist — Mabus — as a member of his new cabinet. And boy would the soothsayer sleuthing tongues of prophecy investigators wag when it happened. They would begin to think the name is not in code like the other two antichrists of Nostradamian fame — Napaulon Roy (king Napoleon) and Hister (Adolf Hitler). The appointment of Mabus to be the civilian leader of the US Navy on the 194th anniversary of the Battle of Waterloo (18 June 2009) has since stirred many readers to send interesting comments, to which I wish to post a response today.
To “Ian” in Australia, I wrote the following:
I’ve been on the trail of Saddam Hussein as the man meant for the Third Antichrist since the mid-1980s. I have always had one candidate foremost in my vision and indeed the 27-year war element (from Century 8 Quatrain 77) is, like the sign of a comet at the Antichrist’s death (Century 2 Quatrain 62), key evidence to support Saddam Hussein as the best candidate. Saddam, more than anyone yet living or recently extinguished, has fulfilled all but one of the important milestones of the Third Antichrist and Mabus quatrains. I state my conclusion about Saddam fully aware that Nostradamus might have someone else in his mind. All students must sustain an alert and fluid intelligence when on the trail for Antichrist. Other candidates still have time to fulfill what Saddam Hussein being dead has notoriously accomplished, such as Usama bin Laden of al-Qaeda terror.
IAN
Ray Mabus AKA Mabus by contrast has not shaped up as an antichrist as Nostradamus simply states the death of Mabus will precipitate world war.
HOGUE
Yes, Mabus could be a victim rather than the antichrist himself. That is an important subplot in my Mabus ebook. Still, one must be cautious about making any hasty conclusions. The future has a funny way of sharing its insights through the back door of unanticipated events or the unanticipated fates of players in these. There are far more clues pointing to Mabus being the code name of the Antichrist and not his victim.
If anything, I have defended Ray Mabus not having any connection with Nostradamus’ Mabus, ever since he was US Ambassador to Saudi Arabia back in the mid-1990s. Then, as now, emails and letters from people saying, “He’s Mabus for sure,” snowed me under!
I cautioned people not to be too enamored with the obvious when it comes to Nostradamus’ prophecies. That 16th-century prophet of Salon-en-Provence preferred the tricky to the obvious answers clearing cloudy verses.
IAN
I have been waiting to see if [Ray Mabus'] will rise through the Obama admin as well. Not because he is a criminal psychopath but rather if he was to be assassinated I’m sure the USA military would collectively go off the deep end as a reaction to such an event, rather than Ray Mabus becoming a Dr Strangelove or antichrist for Pete’s sake. The quatrain suggests nothing more nothing less, don’t you think?
HOGUE
It seems to make sense, your conclusion, that is; however, prophecy can follow illogical lines to fulfillment. I describe in my book a number of angles or traps of interpretation. We interpreters over time have adopted a bad habit of assuming Nostradamus never misread his visions; moreover, that the shadowed way these visions came to him were somehow easy to read. There is enough evidence in the prophecies to illuminate how strange and hard to fathom where the visions delivered in Theurgic rites from emissaries of other planes of existence.
IAN
The King of terror fits Bush Jr. to a T, yet many lump this into the antichrist mould as well…. he really gets around this character.
HOGUE
It does in your mind and the minds of many; however, as I explained in the book, if you follow the effrayeur-terror word link down through different quatrains disclosing aspects of the larger Antichrist prophecy, the evidence pulls away from leaders of European stock and points to some Muslim fanatic like Usama bin Laden as Mabus. (Usama = maaus. Replace the redundant ‘a’ with the one missing letter allowed in anagramming and you get “ma(b)us” out of “Usama.”
IAN
Sometimes I think we try to bundle too much from abstract verse, condensing what are really separate lines of enquiry from separate quatrains. In the end, the interpretation of the verse can mean all things to all people.
HOGUE
That is true. Nevertheless, one can equally ignore too often the linguistic connections of one quatrain in one Century (volume) to a quatrain in another Century of Nostradamus’ magnum opus Les Propheties (The Prophecies). That is why I took so much care to take readers of my Mabus book down the labyrinthine and slippery path of interpreting Nostradamus’ words. Caution, saddled with regular pauses to reflect upon one’s own projections, is a virtue often lacking in the works of most Nostradamus authors. I can count on only two fingers a few who were mindful of their own projections: Bardo Kidogo and Edgar Leoni. Even a scholar so great as Leoni could fall into making sweeping and even petulant dismissals of the occult aspects of Nostradamus’ language, I think, because he lacked understanding of that important dimension to the prophecies.
One must test all observations and assumptions, purifying them of the dross of our ever unconsciously lurking conceits.
John Hogue
(Night of 23 October 2009)
7 Responses “Ray Mabus as Antichrist? Part 1”
"For real democracy to flower, you first need a real humanity." - 
Here we go again. But firstly (and with no sinister motive intended) golly gosh how ‘alike’ Ray Mabus and John Hogue are. Twins perhaps ?
Look:- The third antichrist has been and gone; he was in fact Nostramabus. Look at the evidence, for starters anything
“Antichrist” clearly falls squarely in the Jewish realm. The Jewish faith condemns Jesus Christ as a ‘born blasphemy’ to God itself. Look it up for yourself, read Jewish scripture and it will be clear to you who or what fits the definition of being AntiChrist. Furthermore Nostramabus loved to play word games. For example “first is last” “here is there” “something is that isn’t” and so on. Frankly I can’t think of any author who writes of the most macabre. All Nostramabus ever wrote about is gore, blood and guts, murder and mayhem, No true prophet ever wrote this sort of stuff, other than the contents of the Jewish “Old Testament” (which is full of “smashing your enemies babies on the rocks to pieces”). Nostramabus was of course Jewish, so by his very birth (and in keeping with the Jewish faith, as are all Jews); he is by birth antichrist) One would assume that Prophets are meant to provide guidance in the conduct of the journey through this life.
There is nothing good in Nostramabus, surely Christ would never approve of seeking wisdom from one who practices the work of the occult, of the black arts, of evil spirits. This practise is in itself AntiChristian. So clearly Nostramabus once again establishes his credetials as the Mabus. He who spent his entire life in the “black arts” in the “occult” talking to the demons in his mind. Surely he was the first and the last Anti christ, sitting alongside Hitler
Haris…Within all your gibberish,I seemed to have missed your point again. The only thing I can figure out is that Christ was a Jew and by extrapolating he was the antichrist…antichrist=christ? rave on my good man or take the advise of an old adage..”It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.”
Don’t worry Haris you are already saved. From here on in it is free ride(concert).
How do you e-mail The Hogue?
I can’t find his e-mail button anywhere.
Anyway, check this link out, http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/news-reports/black-cardinal-could-be-the-next-roman-catholic-pope-news-report/
The next pope could be a black man, and his name is Peter…Petrus Romanus anyone?
Nevermind…I found it on the bottom of the website.
Patience Achintya, be patient, your journey to your truth and your self awareness will require you read books. Start with the Old Testament, the Torah, the New Testament and thenfinally the Quran and all will be revealed. It seems to me that you’re looking for fish in the wrong pond; you’ve said so yourself (that you’ve spent many years trying to decipher the words of the court jester), why not read what the rest of the world reads as well – what are you afraid of ?
Thanks you Haris…I have read them all some of them many times. I am afraid of nothing.